Athena SWAN Gender Equality Snakes and Ladders

Return to start

50

Athena Swan Bronze achieved

43

44

Panicked, over-hasty submission

45

46

47

Senior staff block Action Plan initiatives

48

49

42

Senior staff block Action Plan initiatives

41

40

39

AS becomes a kudos driven, box-ticking exercise

38

37

Peer review from a critical friend

36

29

30

Working hard with colleagues

31

32

33

Co-written AS submission

34

35

SAT Chair too junior or ineffective

28

Data from focus groups prompts activity

27

26

Progress slowed by delays

25

Change of key personnel

24

23

SAT inactive or indifferent

22

15

16

Data difficulties

17

18

19

Focus groups build camaraderie

20

Uncovering evidence of discrimination

21

14

13

12

Staff conflict

11

SAT Chair adequately supported

10

9

8

Statistical expertise on SAT

1

Convene SAT and start analysis

2

3

Advice from former AS applicants

4

5

6

SAT active and enthusiastic

7



Other games you might like to play

Careers Twister
Pay Gap Mousetrap
Intersectional Jeopardy
Hiring Practices Bingo
Promotion Monopoly
Action Plan Jenga

This infographic was produced by Prof Abigail Woods and Dr Alana Harris for the project 'The Impact of Athena SWAN on Humanities Departments.' The project was funded by Advance HE. A full report is available on the Advance HE website. Research assistance was provided by Dr Dorothee Boulanger. Tiffany Ong of King's Digital Lab was the digital designer and Ben Peppiatt (Freelance Designer) was the creative illustrator.